Di Jalanan atau Di Mahkamah?

6:22 PM | Posted in pas, royalti minyak

Perdebatan mengenai isu royalti minyak berterusan. Kerajaan Kelantan berkata kemungkinan akan membawa isu itu kemahkamah. Malah dalam sidang DUN Kelantan baru-baru ini telah dibawa usul untuk membawa isu royalti ini ke mahkamah yang juga turut di sokong oleh Adun-Adun BN. Bila agaknya akan dibawa ke mahkamah? Bersungguhkah Kerajaan Kelantan nak bawa isu ini ke mahkamah untuk mencapai penyelesaian?

Ibrahim Ali pun nak bawa isu ini ke mahkamah jika Kerajaan Kelantan tak bawa atas kapasitinya sebagai rakyat Kelantan. Siapa dulu akan ke mahkamah?

Menarik, apabila Salahudin Ayob, Naib Presiden PAS menyatakan rakyat Kelantan akan berdemo di jalanan Kuala Lumpur dan bukannya di Kota Bahru berhubung isu royal minyak yang dituntut oleh Kerajaan Kelantan. Apakah ini bertujuan untuk menimbulkan kekacauan dan huru hara kerana solusi ke mahkamah hanya gimik politik kerajaan Kelantan sahaja.

Jika benar kerajaan Kelantan merasakan mereka berhak untuk mendapatkan royalti kenapa tak disegerakan ke mahkamah untuk pengadilan, kenapa perlu berceramah di sana sini menghabiskan masa? Go straight to court ! PAS Kelantan cuba untuk mengeksploitasi isu ini untuk keuntungan politik parti PAS semata-mata kerana kurang yakin kes ini akan menyebelahi mereka jika ke mahkamah, bukan kerana kurang keyakinan keadilan mahkamah tetapi kerana keyakinan hakikat sebenar kerajaan Kelantan tidak berhak ke atas royalti yang dituntut.

Apapun PAS nak berdemo lagi di jalalan. Baca di sini.

Category: pas, royalti minyak

��

Comments

0 responses to "Di Jalanan atau Di Mahkamah?"

Seksyen 377

Seksyen 377A KK :

“Any person who has sexual connection with another person by the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of the other person is said to commit carnal intercourse against the order of nature.“

Seksyen 377B KK menyatakan:

“Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty years, and shall also be liable to whipping.“

Seksyen 377C KK menyatakan:

“Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature on another person without the consent, or against the will, of the other person, or by putting the other person in fear of death or hurt to the person or any other person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term of not less than five years and not more than twenty years, and shall also be liable to whipping.“

The Pope is a criminal. Seriously

Sat Apr 10 2010 7:23 pm
by Bob Morris.

No one must question us or our power !!!

The AP’s story on Joseph Ratzinger’s direct involvement in delaying for six years the defrocking of a priest who had confessed to tying up and raping minors ends any doubt that the future Pope is as implicated in the sex abuse crisis as much as any other official in the church.

Even worse, the boys were pre-teens. Local bishops wanted the priest fired. The priest requested he be defrocked. Ratzinger refused, citing bad publicity for the Church. The priest continued to rape children for several more years. None of these facts are in doubt and Ratzinger’s signature is on the letter.

We see a man utterly corrupted by power and institutional loyalty.

So when does he resign?

Related news:

A Texas youth has filed a lawsuit alleging rape at gunpoint by a local priest and that the bishop, soon to be cardinal of Los Angeles, should have known.

In truly stomach-turning language, the Vatican now says it is willing to meet with sex abuse victims to take part in the Church’s healing process. Truly, it is deeply noble and self-sacrificing of the Vatican to deign to meet with those raped and abused by their own clergy so as to help the Church, not the victims, heal.

selumbaq